Which of the following roles is NOT typically involved in grants administration at NIH?

In the context of grants administration at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), it is important to understand the specific roles and responsibilities associated with each position listed. The Financial Officer, while crucial in the overall financial management of grants and institutions, is generally not considered a direct participant in the grants administration process at NIH.

The primary function of the Compliance Analyst involves ensuring that grant proposals and funded projects adhere to federal regulations and NIH policies, which makes them a central figure in grants administration. Similarly, the Program Director plays a key role in overseeing grant applications, providing guidance to applicants regarding programmatic priorities, and managing funded projects. The Scientific Review Administrator is responsible for leading the review process of grant applications, ensuring that scientific merit is rigorously evaluated before funding decisions are made.

In contrast, the Financial Officer usually handles broader financial management tasks rather than directly engaging in the grants administration process. This includes budgeting, forecasting, and resource allocation, which, while vitally important, do not involve the specific processes associated with the granting of funds, review of applications, or compliance oversight. Therefore, this position is not typically categorized under the roles that directly contribute to grants administration at NIH.