What type of license is typically required for copyrighted works resulting from federally sponsored activities?

The correct response is that a royalty-bearing and nonexclusive license is generally required for copyrighted works that emerge from federally sponsored activities. This type of license allows multiple parties to use the copyrighted material without the need for exclusive rights held by a single entity.

In the context of federally sponsored activities, the government typically requires that works created using federal funding be available for use by the government and potentially by the public, ensuring broad access while still allowing for the original creator to receive royalties. This provision helps stimulate the dissemination of knowledge and innovation while also providing a revenue stream for the creators.

A royalty-bearing aspect of the license indicates that any entity using the work must compensate the creator, aligning with the expectations set forth in many Federal regulations regarding intellectual property produced with federal funds. This ensures that the creators benefit financially from the use of their work, in addition to promoting broader accessibility and usage within the bounds of the licensing agreement.

In contrast, other types of licenses such as exclusive licenses would limit the number of parties able to use the work and could contradict the goal of maximizing access. Non-exclusive and revocable licenses may not adequately capture the need for both adaptability and financial compensation. Lastly, a royalty-free license would negate the financial interests of the creators, which is